Home Bill Lynn Research Teaching Downloads Ethics Ethos Muse Wolves Contact

Posts RSS Comments RSS 190 Posts and 53 Comments till now

Archive for September, 2007

Humour: An Athiest in the Woods

woods.jpgAn atheist was walking through the woods.

“What majestic trees”!

“What powerful rivers”!

“What beautiful animals”!

He said to himself.

As he was walking alongside the river, he heard a rustling in the bushes behind him. He turned to look. He saw a 7-foot grizzly charge towards him. He ran as fast as he could up the path. He looked over his shoulder and saw that the bear was closing In on him.

He looked over his shoulder again, and the bear was even closer. He tripped and fell on the ground. He rolled over to pick himself up but saw that the bear was right on top of him, reaching for him with his left paw and raising his right paw to strike him. At that instant the Atheist cried out, “Oh my God!”

Time Stopped.

The bear froze.

The forest was silent.

As a bright light shone upon the man, a voice came out of the sky. “You deny my existence for all these years, teach others I don’t exist and even credit creation to cosmic accident.” “Do you expect me to help you out of this predicament? Am I to count you as a believer”? The atheist looked directly into the light, “It would be hypocritical of me to suddenly ask You to treat me as a Christian now, but perhaps You could make the BEAR a Christian”?

“Very Well,” said the voice.

The light went out. The sounds of the forest resumed. And the bear dropped his right paw, brought both paws together, bowed his head and spoke:

“Lord bless this food, which I am about to receive from thy bounty through Christ our Lord, Amen.”

Lisa Brown

Simon, LisaPractical Ethics just keeps getting better and better. Please join me in welcoming Lisa Brown as a contributing author on the blog. Lisa completed her Masters of Science at the Center for Animals and Public Policy at Tufts University. Her thesis was the development of a university-level course curriculum entitled Animalities: Animals, Art and Public Policy. The course is a reflection of Lisa’s passion for exploring animals in film, television, photography, comic books, advertising and other art forms. These underrated and undervalued topics offer a unique perspective on the significance of the represented animal and give scholars the opportunity to uncover both latent and explicit views on animals. One of the aims of the course is to establish the study of pop culture as a legitimate policy tool.

Lisa received her undergraduate degree in political autobiography from Hampshire College. This academic foundation in writing and women’s studies led to active participation in the reproductive rights movement as a freelance writer. However, Lisa found her real passion when she discovered her interest in nonhuman primate welfare, cognition and rights. She is fascinated by the cultural boundary between nonhuman apes and humans, a boundary that has profound legal ramifications for all animals.This focus on nonhuman primates began in 2001 when Lisa started working at Helping Hands: Monkey Helpers for the Disabled. This is an organization which breeds, raises and trains capuchin monkeys to help severely disabled individuals. Despite leaving the organization in 2006 to pursue her master’s degree, she maintains a close relationship with the non-profit and has taken on the role of foster mom to a monkey. Her personal relationship with this monkey (and all monkeys she has befriended) has an ongoing influence on all her pursuits in human-animal studies.

Lisa’s musings on animals in art and popular culture can be found here on Practical Ethics, as well as her blog Animal Inventory, http://animalinventory.net/.

You can contact Lisa at 617-750-5611 or via email at lisabrown@animalinventory.net.

(Photo by Nicole V. Hill)

Karin Lauria

Karin.jpg

Practical Ethics continues to grow, and I have the immense pleasure of introducing Karin Lauria, our newest contributor.

Karin brings a wealth of editorial experience to Practical Ethics, having worked for over twelve years as an editor and marketing writer for the high-tech industry. She is currently a freelance editor at Lauria Consulting, where she advises on and edits academic books and articles, grant proposals, dissertations, and other publications. At Practical Ethics, she will be screening and editing all essays submitted by guest writers, while posting blogs on human-animal relations and religion.

Karin also brings an expertise in religion. In 2007 she earned her masters in theological studies from Boston University School of Theology. Her concentrations were in ethics and hermeneutics.

Karin’s research interest is theologies of animals, especially as they relate to ethics and science. During the course of her research, Karin found that many theo-ethical approaches lacked a practical vision for guiding religious communities in their thought and action toward the treatment of animals. To address this need, she is developing a practical theology of animals based on the theological hermeneutics of Donald S. Browning, as well as the practical ethics of Mary Midgley and Holmes Rolston.

You can contact her at:

Karin Lauria, MA
Lauria Consulting
12 Mountain Ave
Marlborough, MA 01752
lauria.consulting@gmail.com
lauriaconsulting.wordpress.com

Association of American Geographers Meeting, April 2008

aag_logo.jpgIt is a real pleasure to join the Practical Ethics blog, and to be part of a community delving into myriad human-animal relationships.

I would like to invite those of you familiar with geography to attend the 2008 AAG meeting in Boston, and to consider submitting a paper for our session on Animal Geographies. We will have sponsorship from the Ethics, Justice, and Human Rights specialty group and Practical Ethics. Please see the CFP below for guidelines and contact information.

For those unfamiliar with the growing research into animal geographies, I would like to take a moment to provide an overview of this developing disciplinary area. Geographers have always had as one of their main focal interests a curiosity about how humans interact with the natural world – what constitutes these interactions, how they vary across time and space, and how specific interactions are contested within societies. The interactions between humans and nonhumans are one huge piece of this puzzle, and over the past ten years geographers have produced a significant body of literature on animal geographies. Examining human-animal relationships in agriculture, the ‘wild’, captive and companion situations, researchers have questioned where and how boundaries between humans and animals have been defined (e.g., research laboratory), how specific places and cultures have shaped interactions (e.g., the connections between heritage livestock breeds and local identities/economies), and the relationship between ethics and animal subjectivities (e.g., what constitutes ethical practices towards nonhumans, how does that vary from place to place, how can the animal as subject be ‘heard’?). Two excellent places to start looking into what animal geography has to offer are: Animal Geographies edited by Jennifer Wolch and Jody Emel and Animal Spaces, Beastly Spaces edited by Chris Philo and Chris Wilbert. I would be happy to provide additional citations to anyone who is interested.

AAG 2008 Call for Papers on Animal Geographies: Current and Future Research Trajectories

As interest in human-animal studies continues to develop within geography, researchers are moving in a variety of novel directions. We are soliciting papers for a session (or sessions) on current research in animal geographies for the 2008 AAG meeting April 15-19 in Boston. Papers may be from any geographic perspective and may address topics such as (but not limited to) technologies, law and policy, ethics, historical geographies, social theory, agriculture, methodologies, animal subjectivities, and human-animal boundary making.

Constraints of the AAG meeting format: Please note that in order to participate in this AAG session, you will have to first register for the conference on the website to obtain a PIN number and then you will need to submit your abstract and PIN number to us and we will formally submit the session. The deadline for session submissions is October 31, 2007. To that end, we ask all interested participants to register and submit their materials to us by October 1st so that we have adequate time to prepare the submission.

Please submit your materials and/or questions to

Julie Urbanik, Ph.D., julie.urbanik@gmail.com, and
Kristin Stewart, Ph.D., kristinlstewart@yahoo.com.

Knowing Dolphins (If Only A Little Bit…) (by Kris Stewart)

pcfieldworkdolphin3Like many people, I find dolphins fascinating. It’s not that I think they’re “better” or “more than” other animals. But I have devoted a fair amount of time to thinking about them (during my graduate work and otherwise). Because I do talk about them so much, I thought it would be nice to take a few minutes to talk more generally about dolphins. This is basic stuff, and by no means exhaustive (even if I could tell you all that the brightest human minds currently know about dolphins, my guess is that we’d still have a great deal to learn), but we might refer back to some of it in future conversations about our relationships with dolphins…

Dolphins are aquatic mammals, classified as belonging to the order called Cetacea, which is made up of whales, dolphins, and porpoises. Cetaceans are divided into odontocetes (toothed whales) and mysticetes (untoothed whales, mostly the great whales who use baleen to strain the water for tiny organisms to eat). Dolphins, orcas, porpoises, freshwater river dolphins, and sperm whales are all considered odontocetes, which is why dolphins are essentially thought of as small toothed whales. Evidence suggests that modern cetaceans originated from a land mammal that is thought to have returned to the sea some 50 to 60 million years ago. Many people are familiar with bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), those most often on display at marine parks and aquariums and the species of dolphin that starred in the Flipper shows and movies. Still, there are more than 30 different species of dolphins worldwide. Like humans, dolphins are highly social and most live in groups ranging from a few members to thousands. They generally devote substantial time and energy to caring for their young and engaging in relationships, some of which have been documented to span decades.

Dolphins have a complex brain. The brain’s cortex is where information is received, organized, analyzed, and stored in mammals, and the surface area of the dolphin cortex is enormous in relation to the rest of the brain (and compared to human brains-the former averaging 3,700 centimeters squared, and the later 2,300 centimeters squared).Dolphin brains are also asymmetrical; asymmetry in humans is associated with such sophisticated mental abilities as language.The dolphin brain is actually similar to the human brain in complexity and convolutions, in brain to body weight ratio, and in neural complexity. (Dolphin brains differ from humans’ in the overall structure and organization, connections to the limbic system and probably other ways that are not yet identified). Dolphin brains are thought to have evolved in a similar process as those of humans, related to the needs and pressures for complex communication and elaborate societies–but dolphin brains, as they are now, have been around millions of years longer than the modern human brain. In fact, humans have had the brain we do for about 100,000 years; dolphins have had the same sized brains (or larger) than ours for about 15 million years.

Dolphins rank higher in encephalization quotient (EQ), the ratio of the brain volume to the surface area of the body, than great apes and have been placed only second to humans. The EQ is significant because it gets higher as the subjects’ social structures get more complex. But some suggest that the EQ measurement may be underestimated in dolphins because of the additional weight of blubber in the cetacean body (see Marino, further resources below). This indicates that dolphins, therefore, may have at least the marine parallel to the human EQ.

With relatively large brains and a substantial cerebral cortex, it is widely accepted in the scientific community that dolphins have considerable cognitive abilities. They communicate with one another using a complex system of whistles, body language, and touching that is not fully understood by dolphin scientists. Dolphins also have learned to communicate with us, if only partially, through the use of a human-created artificial language. In addition, scientists and dolphin trainers agree that dolphins have a rich emotional life, including a sense of humor, and people who regularly work with them often speak of dolphins as having distinct personalities.

Dolphins also exhibit a sense of self. Rigorous studies indicate that dolphins recognize their own reflections in a mirror-a very rare capability in the animal kingdom that was only confirmed in humans and great apes before a recent study showed that dolphins also share this capacity.In experiments with captive dolphins at the New York aquarium, researchers first marked the dolphins with “sham” marks, and then exposed them to a mirror. After several repetitions, the scientists put temporary black ink on parts of the dolphins’ bodies, which they could see only in a mirror. In each of the trials, the dolphins went to the mirror to examine the areas the scientists had marked.

Until very recently, scientists believed that self-recognition was possible only in animals with a frontal lobe, such as humans and other primates. Recent dolphin self-recognition studies, however, suggest that mirror recognition is probably linked with more general characteristics, such as large brain size and cognitive ability (especially because dolphins’ and primates’ brains evolved along very different lines). In any event, the research indicates that dolphins have an acute sense of themselves and others.

Self-awareness is also indicated by dolphins’ use of signature whistles–the equivalent of a unique name–which they apparently use to call one another when separated over distance, among other things.In addition, scientists have found that dolphins, like humans, act independently of instinct, biological drive or conditioning. Indicating what would be called “free will” in humans, dolphins make purposeful choices and conscious decisions in their lives, even when it comes to sexual activity and eating.

Dolphins also show that they understand responsibility, both as relates to other dolphins and other species. Moreover, dolphins often demonstrate altruistic behavior, such as routinely baby-sitting for one another, and assisting dolphins who are hurt or distressed for no apparent gain to themselves.

All in all, dolphins apparently share a suite of attributes with humans-many of which humans believed until recently that we alone possessed, such as intelligence, emotions, and self awareness. But dolphins also have inner and outer worlds that are completely foreign to us. They are marvelously suited for their watery environment with muscled, streamlined bodies, a powerful tail fluke to propel them through the water, and pectoral fins with which to steer. Their blowhole allows dolphins to breathe efficiently with only a small amount of their bodies out of the water and their lungs are made up of twice the capillaries of human lungs, which, along with other anatomical attributes, allows dolphins to dive deeper, surface more quickly and remain under water far longer than any human is capable of doing without aid. Most remarkably, dolphins navigate their world primarily through the use of senses we do not have. For dolphins, sound is the primary perception tool, but their use of sound is far more complex than a human’s. Using a sophisticated system of echolocation, dolphins project sonic clicks that return echoes that portray a three-dimensional image of the world around them. As sound passes through living tissues, dolphins routinely “see through” each other and every other living organism.

Perhaps what amazes me most is the combination of their familiarity on the one hand, and their exotic other-worldliness on the other.Knowing what we do about dolphins–and understanding that there is so much we do not fully understand about them-how does that figure in the ways we think about them? More than that, ought knowing these creatures as socially complex, feeling, sapient individuals have a considerable impact on how we interact with them?

Further Resources:

Griffin, D. (2001). Animal minds: Beyond cognition to consciousness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Herzing, D. L., & White, T. I. (1999). Dolphins and the question of personhood. Etica & Animali.

Marino, L., Rilling, J. K., Lin, S. K., & Ridgway, S. H. (2000). Relative volume of the cerebellum in dolphins and comparison with anthropoid apes. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 56, 204-211.

Pryor, K., & Norris, K. S. (Eds.). (1991). Dolphin societies: Discoveries and puzzles. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Reiss, D., & Marino, L. (2001). Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: A case of cognitive convergence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(10), 5937-5942.

Reynolds, J. E. I., Wells, R. S., & Eide, S. D. (2000). The bottlenose dolphin: Biology and conservation. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.